Scandals: Thank you, Congressman Shays
(Scroll down for article)
FREEDOM OF CHOICE IS NOT FREE
Vaccination News, A Non-Profit Corporation
All the News (includes Breaking News) - a running tab of everything posted on this website since October 29, 2003
Return to Vaccination News Home Page (for best results, right click to "open in new window")
View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Gottstein aka Mintz)
Subscribe to Scandals
Search This Site using keywords
click here to download Adobe Reader
Scandals - 09/27/02
Thank you, Congressman Shays
Those of you who have been following me over the years know that my mantra has always been that there are almost no vaccine safety or efficacy studies using never vaccinated children as controls. (1, 2, 3) It has long been my hope that I would somehow be able to make that point to the right person or persons, to appeal to someone who might have the ability to seriously address the problem.
Never did I dream it would happen the way it did, however, that is, the only time I was able to attend one of Congressman Burton's Government Reform Committee hearings, "THE AUTISM EPIDEMIC--IS THE NIH AND CDC RESPONSE ADEQUATE?". What follows is a transcript of what happened (for the entire transcript, click here).
"Mr. Shays. Dr. Foote and Dr. Boyle, let me just
say it is our intention to let you get out pretty soon. You haven't had a break
or anything. Do you have 20 more minutes in you? Are you OK?
I am going to do something that may seem a little unusual,
and I may have to just cut it off if it is not a good idea. But, Dr. Foote
and Dr. Boyle, if you can trust me in terms of my ability to control a meeting,
it is not lost on me that we have a lot of people in the audience who have a
keen direct interest. There may be a question or two that none of us on the
panel here have asked that we should have. I am going to ask if there is someone
in the audience who may have a question that says we should have addressed this.
I will allow you to stand up and tell the committee, and then we may choose, our
committee may choose to ask that question.
My motivation is that it would be a shame to have people
leave without you having the opportunity to respond and maybe clear something
up. Both of you have such a nice, friendly smile. I figured I could get away
with it. So we are going to try it out, but I have the counsel--excuse me, the
minority counsel would like to ask you a few questions, the majority
professional staff would just like to ask a few more, and then I am going to
just throw it out to the audience, pick two or three of you and ask you to stand
and tell me if there is a question you think we should have asked, loud enough
so I can repeat it to our witnesses......
Mr. Shays. Now let me state what I would like to do. I
would like to let our witnesses leave soon. I would like to just say that this
is a hearing of the House of Representatives, of Congress, so the decorum needs
to be done well.
I am going to first ask how many people would like to ask the
question. I am going to invite five people to take each of those five seats. I
am going to invite you, Ma'am, in the front row to come up to that seat up
there, yes. I am going to invite you in the very back to come up, the very back
there. I am going to invite you, sir, to come up. I am going to invite you,
Ma'am, in the middle, and I am going to invite you in the very back there.
I am going to have you each take a seat. What I am going to
invite each of you to do, the committee is going to invite each of you, you are
just going to go down and you are going to identify your name, as you ask the
question, where you live. If you have a loved one who is impacted, we are happy
to have you share the name of your child, but this is primarily for an
opportunity to ask a question. We will just see how it goes.
OK?
You all are nice--thank you--to let us do this.
Just turn the mic on, start at the very end, and ask your
question.
Ms. Mintz. Hi. My name is Sandy Mintz. I am from
Anchorage, AK. I am lucky enough not to have a child who has been injured by a
vaccine.
My question is, is NIH ever planning on doing a study using
the only proper control group, that is, never vaccinated children?
Dr. Foote. I am not aware of--but note carefully what
I said, that I am not aware of--a proposed study to use a suitably constructed
group of never vaccinated children. Now CDC would be more likely perhaps to be
aware of such an opportunity.
Dr. Boyle. The study that I mentioned earlier that we
are doing in collaboration with Denmark compares children who received the MMR
vaccine versus children who did not receive MMR.
Ms. Mintz. But I am saying never vaccinated with any
vaccine. That assumes that other vaccines don't cause autism, which is what
needs to be studied, not assumed.
Mr. Shays. Let me just say that if you would turn off
your mic, I am happy to have you do the followup, if you would respond to it.
Ms. Mintz. I'm sorry.
Mr. Shays. No, you don't need to apologize. And we
will go to the next. Do you have any other comment based on that? The point that
is being made, any vaccination. Could we just suggest that you take this under
advisement?
Ms. Wharton. The difficulty with doing such a study in
the United States, of course, is that a very small portion of children have
never received any vaccines, and these children probably differ in other ways
from vaccinated children. So performing such a study would, in fact, be quite
difficult.
The Denmark study was a study that, in fact, could not have
been done in the United States, although, of course, these children did
potentially receive some other vaccines, but simply hadn't received MMR.
Mr. Shays. I will invite anyone who is here to speak
to staff or me afterwards if they want to augment a comment."
While I wasn't able to "augment my comment" right after the meeting, here's the gist of what I later emailed to Beth Clay, the professional committee staff member who was present at the hearing:
1) There are more than enough never vaccinated children in the states which allow philosophical exemptions to conduct a proper study.
2) If children who have not been vaccinated are different in ways that prevent them from getting autism, wouldn't we want to know that?
Well, wouldn't we?
Sandy Mintz
Look for the next Scandals on Friday, October 4, 2002.
Past Scandals
©Copyright
2001-2002 by Sandy Mintz. All Rights Reserved. This content may be copied in full ONLY with copyright, contact, creation, authorship, and information intact (including all links), without specific permission, and ONLY when used in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Sandy Mintz is required.Return to Vaccination News Home Page (for best results, right click to "open in new window")
DISCLAIMER: All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.