Parents do not trust medical advice on the controversial MMR jab because
they know GPs are paid to recommend it, doctors have warned.
Members of the British Medical Association passed a motion at their
annual conference attacking the present "target payment" system.
In this GPs receive money if a certain proportion of children at their
practice are immunised.

Patients do think GPs are recommending MMR because they are getting
paid for it

|
|
Dr Steve Hajioff, public health doctor
|
There are fears that some parents do
not trust their GPs to be impartial about the controversial measles, mumps
and rubella vaccine's safety because of the system.
Currently, GPs receive up to £910 each year if 70% of infants on their
list are immunised, or up to £2,730 if 90% complete their vaccination
course.
MMR is one of four childhood vaccinations that have to be given. The
uptake of each of these vaccines is added together to determine wheter GPs
have met the targets and will get paid.
However, GPs have complained that recent health scares over MMR mean
many parents are refusing to have their children vaccinated, which has
meant they have lost out on money through no fault of their own.
Right to choose
Dr Richard Vautrey, of the BMA's occupational health committee told the
conference he was in favour of MMR, and that his son had recently received
his second vaccination.
But he said yesterday, he had seen a mother who did have concerns.
"She is a sensible mum, who wants nothing but the best for her own
child, but she still needs a little more time to think about whether she
should bring her daughter for the MMR.
"She should be allowed that time.
"She shouldn't be pressured or bullied as as result of some dictat from
a Whitehall civil servant, but helped and supported to make the right
decision.
"The target system which we find ourselves trying to cope with
completely fails in situations like this. Surely parents have the right to
say no."
In a snapshot survey of GPs at the conference for BBC Radio 5 Live, a
third said their income had been affected by low MMR uptake in the last
year.
Almost three out of four of the 51 questioned said that if MMR was
removed from the system, it would help them to persuade parents to have
their children immunised.
They said the current arrangement is damaging trust between doctors and
parents.
A third of the doctors said they had seen an increase in measles cases,
and a quarter had seen an increase in the numbers of cases of mumps.
More than half said they had seen the uptake of MMR at their practice
go down in the last year, while one third said it had stayed level.
More measles cases
Doctors are suggesting parents should be able to opt out of
immunisations in a system of "informed dissent", so if they refuse to have
a vaccination they can be taken off the practice's target list for jabs.
The Public Health Laboratory Service said MMR uptake was 83.8%
nationally, whereas it should be at least 95% of children immunised by the
age of two.
Its figures show there are usually 100 cases of measles each year, but
by mid-June this year, there had already been 159 cases.
Dr Hamish Meldrum, joint deputy chairman of the BMA's GPs committee
told BBC News Online said: "We are in a situation where doctors really
believe in MMR and its effectiveness and safety.
"Increasingly, we are finding doctors are being accused of saying what
they are saying because there is money in it for them."
He said "informed dissent" could be the solution.
"If a patient, having had a course of treatment or a vaccination or a
lifestyle change explained to them, says 'thanks doc, but no thanks', we
could record that fact."
Independent advocate
Dr Steve Hajioff, a public health doctor in London said: "I'm convinced
that the target payment system is acting as a barrier, rather than an
incentive, in general practice.
"It's important that a GP is seen to be an independent advocate of
patients' interests."
Liberal Democrat health spokesman Dr Evan Harris supported the move.
"It is right to end vaccination payment targets for doctors.
"Targets are counterproductive because they don't increase the number
of vaccinations and are seen as unethical."