|
Special report: Labour party |
Special report: party funding
Auditors take wider look
at smallpox vaccine deal
Watchdog checks on
contracts awarded to Labour donor's firm
Rob Evans and David Hencke
Saturday July 13, 2002
The Guardian
The national audit office has widened its investigation into the
controversial £32m smallpox vaccine contract awarded without competition to
Powderject, a company owned by Labour donor Paul Drayson.
The expanded inquiry by parliament's financial watchdog is examining a
second Powderject contract, which was also awarded by the Department of
Health without rival bids and was criticised for being at a highly inflated
price.
The NAO inquiry began after the row over the awarding of the smallpox
contract, to accusations of sleaze, to Dr Drayson who has given £100,000 to
Labour in the past year.
The inquiry will be the first comprehensive examination of how the
government has awarded multi-million pound contracts to commercial companies
to produce up to 10 vaccines to protect millions of Britons.
Auditors at the NAO have decided they need a proper benchmark to work out
how vaccines contracts are handled by government .
Since April, the NAO has been scrutinising minutely ministers' claims
that Powderject had to be given the lucrative smallpox contract because it
was the only company which could deliver the required number of doses of the
right strain of smallpox vaccine at the right time.
They plan to put their findings to all the rival companies involved in
the smallpox "beauty contest" before Powderject was given the contract to
see if the firms agree with the official version.
The government's conduct in the smallpox contract is being compared to
its procedures in ordering the other vaccines. The Guardian has learnt that
Department of Health officials have put up a vigorous defence of its actions
over the smallpox contract to the NAO, arguing it was correct to prevent
other firms from bidding.
Ministers claimed that open bidding would have revealed sensitive details
about its plans to defend Britain against a biological terrorist attack. The
NAO is to be given access to all the high security documents in the case.
But also coming under the NAO's scrutiny is Powderject's two-year, £17m
contract to produce anti-tuberculosis vaccines for the Department of Health.
Critics have pointed out that the contract, announced in March last year,
cost the NHS four times what it had previously been paying.
Powderject was the sole bidder for the contract, as the Department of
Health insisted it was the only manufacturer with a proper, British safety
licence to produce the vaccine.
Powderject also has a contract to supply a flu vaccine to the NHS.
Whitehall has disclosed few details of the smallpox contract on national
security grounds, but the NAO is believed to be pressing for as much as
possible to be made public when it reports on its investigation, probably in
November.
NAO officials and Whitehall civil servants are thought to be concerned
that there would be political uproar if they produced a secret report which
was then examined in private by the Commons public accounts committee.
Such action would aggravate the controversy over the deal.
Get the day's top headlines straight to your mobile
|
Sign up for the Backbencher |
Our weekly insider's guide to parliament
Email us at
politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
Party funding
Electoral
commission
Printable version |
Send it to a friend |
Read it later |
See saved stories

|